<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Welcome to the Systematic Theology Collection</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/38</link>
    <description>Welcome to the Systematic Theology Collection</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 16:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-03-19T16:30:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unsafe spaces? An ecclesiological evaluation and response to recent controversial practices in some South African neo-Pentecostal churches</title>
      <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/40</link>
      <description>Title: Unsafe spaces? An ecclesiological evaluation and response to recent controversial practices in some South African neo-Pentecostal churches
Authors: Banda, Collium
Abstract: From a communal perspective of the church, this article analyses critically the controversial&#xD;
practices reported in some South African neo-Pentecostal (SANP) churches, such as feeding&#xD;
congregants with grass. The article examines the effect of the controversial practices on the&#xD;
meaning of the church. The main question answered in this article is as follows: What is&#xD;
the nature of the church that emerges from the controversial practices reported amongst some&#xD;
SANP churches? And what is a biblically informed understanding of the church that can be&#xD;
used to end these practices that violate the human rights of congregants? The question is&#xD;
answered by describing the controversial SANP practices and examining the theological&#xD;
foundations of these controversial practices. The article argues for the necessity for a sound&#xD;
church doctrine as a way of curbing these controversial practices. This ecclesiology must take&#xD;
seriously the communal nature of the church. The contribution of the article is showing the&#xD;
need for Christians to take personal responsibility to guard against practices that make their&#xD;
churches unsafe spaces.
Description: Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The article combines perspectives&#xD;
from the communal nature of the church, the Trinity and the salvation mission of the church to&#xD;
analyse the state of the church represented by the controversial SANP churches which use&#xD;
questionable practices, such as healing rituals that involve spraying people with insecticides.&#xD;
The study has direct implications on the doctrine of the church, ministerial practices and&#xD;
foundations of the church that make churches safe places for their members.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/40</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-11-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>God as a Servant of Magic? The Challenge of the Impersonalisation of God in Neo-Pentecostal Prophetic Responses to Human Agency and Transcendence in Africa</title>
      <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/39</link>
      <description>Title: God as a Servant of Magic? The Challenge of the Impersonalisation of God in Neo-Pentecostal Prophetic Responses to Human Agency and Transcendence in Africa
Authors: Banda, Collium
Abstract: This article is a Christian theological evaluation of African neo-Pentecostal prophets’&#xD;
(ANPPs) projection of God as a servant of prophetic rituals in their solutions to poor human agency&#xD;
(power to act) and transcendence (power to overcome) in Africa. Instead of propagating a personal&#xD;
relational God who transforms the poor and empowers their agency and transcendence by personally&#xD;
engaging with them, ANPPs propagate a God who works by ritual manipulation. The main question&#xD;
answered in the article is: what is the notion of God that informs and guides the ANPPs’ engagement&#xD;
with human agency and transcendence in Africa? The question is answered by first presenting&#xD;
a framework of God’s personality. The ANPPs’ impersonalized view of God is described. The&#xD;
basis of the impersonalisation of God in ATR is presented. The vulnerability of human agency and&#xD;
transcendence as a result of the impersonalisation of God is described. The article closes by proposing&#xD;
how a personal Trinitarian view of God rejects the ANPP impersonalisation of God and describes how&#xD;
the Trinitarian view can assist in addressing the problem of human agency and transcendence among&#xD;
poor Africans. The contribution of the article lies in challenging ANPPs to desist from addressing&#xD;
poor human agency and transcendence in Africa by propagating a version of God who is a servant&#xD;
of magical rituals instead of a relational God who is personally involved with the poor to empower&#xD;
them to overcome the hindrances to their human flourishing.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/39</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

